Laila's Misrepresentation of IWF Data
TL;DR - Laila deliberately misrepresents the Internet Watch Foundation's data to demonize internet porn. The report itself shows that the responsibility for well over 99% of CSEM cases lies elsewhere. Nevertheless, she attacks a company invested in fighting the problem months before TraffickingHub existed.

Full-size image is here.
Full PDF of report available here.
Laila accuses PornHub of lying when it claims their confirmed CSEM cases was 118, but Laila knows the data comes from the Internet Watch Foundation's report.

Full-size image is here.
Page 20 contains a graph that makes it very clear that porn websites are not where a child advocate's energy should go.

Full-size image is here.
Laila generously rounds up "less than one percent" to one percent.

Full-size image is here.
Laila also "overlooks" that the 118 cases were recorded over two years. The actual figure for a year would be 0.000867647% (A desktop calculator used to find this figure actually rounded it down to zero.) On average, IWF found one instance of CSEM on PH every week, in which time the site got over 800 million hits on its legal content.

Full-size image is here.
Page 21 contains data showing Laila's Section 230 and EARN IT Act stances are not effective solutions to combat CSEM, as only 12% of instances were hosted in the U.S.

Full-size image is here.
Page 43 runs contrary to Laila's insistence that parental responsibility is not a factor. The data shows 27% of CSEM is generated by unsupervised minors, not by traffickers.

Full-size image is here.
Laila uses words like "infested" to describe the amount of CSEM on social media, but less than 3% of a day's worth of valid reports came from the public. Less than half of one percent came from commercial websites like PH and Twitter. The rest were found by the professionals who deliberately sought it out.

Full-size image is here.
Over a year, only 28% of public reports are accurate.

Full-size image is here.
MindGeek contributes to the effort to more effectively report CSEM, which Laila tries to spin as a negative for MindGeek and the non-profit organization.

Full-size image is here.
After cherry-picking their work for nearly a year, she disdains the IWF on the basis of credibility.

Full-size image is here.
The press release in question was issued eight months before the TraffickingHub campaign was created, and thus before any of Laila's tweets using IWF data.