TL;DR: AvriSapir has been identified. Her narrative is provably false.
DO NOT HARASS THE INDIVIDUAL OR HER FAMILY!
This album is for informational purposes. All data herein was publicly available at the time it was obtained. This album is the result of a tool-assisted process, therefore files may have been automatically cropped, renamed, etc. No relevant information has been deliberately altered or excluded. The party responsible for generating the album affirms the following matters are true to the best of their information, knowledge, and belief.
AvriSapir's Modus Operandi
- Avri tells harrowing stories of being trafficked and abused by her father.
- Avri claims content showing her abuse is uploaded frequently, but her father escaped justice.
- Avri claims a video removed by NCMEC features her, but alternately states she was a toddler and a 9-year-old in it.
- Avri is detailed in telling her stories, but balks at healthy, skeptical questions because they're "re-traumatizing."
- Avri offers extremely dubious forms of "proof" of her abuse and Blocks or ignores suggestions of actual proof.
- Avri uses her "survivor status" as a shield against questions regarding the above and, often, as a weapon in arguments.
Avri claims her content is uploaded so often she has to spend six hours daily hunting for it (a gross exaggeration of CSEM's actual prevalence)
Avri has never attempted to explain how her "fans" could possibly have associated specific CSEM with her account
Avri's idea of proof is usually a screenshot of an interaction that could have been faked, which she then heavily redacts
The blacked out URL would not show any offending video, but would show meta-data proving its upload date, view count, etc.
Avri relies on testimony of "antis", social media users with no set qualifications who look for CSEM without law enforcement approval
Avri has a symbiosis with other Exodus Cry (EC) associates who refuse to share evidence like court documents to corroborate their claims of abuse
Avri borrows from her YouTube research into child abuse to discuss a maladaptive coping mechanism common among victims
The rest of Avri's essay, none of which is predicated on first-hand experience
Avri's initially claimed a video accumulated a paltry 600 views, later scaling her accusation up to match PornHub's actual traffic potential
Avri frequently claims that video of her as a toddler in diapers was uploaded
More than once, she refers to this specific screenshot as an instance of her rape as a toddler
Sometimes, however, she changes her story and refers to herself as being a 9-year-old instead
Avri characterizes her mother as verbally and emotionally abusive
Early on, Avri establishes that her "main abuser" was her father
Avri asserts her father trafficked and raped her from birth until age 15
Avri alludes to eventually being a captive of a brothel in Queens for years
Avri describes textbook grooming and confirms her father is not in prison for his deeds
Avri's father is wealthy from selling her content and trafficking her. Meanwhile, Avri describes her mother as living "in poverty"
Avri witnesses a pimp with the savvy to acquire these lucrative girls carelessly beat one to death
Despite the high value of the content, someone goes to a great deal of trouble to defeat digital fingerprinting and post it for free on PornHub, at great risk to themselves.
Avri's content is found so often that she made a graphic to preempt basic questions about it
Avri's graphic with link intact
Despite the abuse videos being uploaded so regularly, Avri avoids discussions about having her dad charged
AvriSapir's Real Identity
- Even before her account was known, Avri engaged with a particular user, Noa S.
- Avri's Twitter account had almost no activity until after Noa's 18th birthday.
- Avri and Noa interacted several times on Twitter before Avri began telling her story.
- Noa and Avri graduated from the same expensive private school (though Avri claims to be poor).
- Avri has, on several occasions, shared photos of a dog owned by Noa's mother.
- Noa's photo and Avri's portrait and self-description have obvious similarities.
- Noa showed a peculiar interest in the CSEM/tech dynamic several months before Avri appears.
- Noa openly expressed abolitionist leanings that Avri "walked back" as her account become popular.
- Noa's political interests and alignments are exactly like those of Avri.
- Noa has the same non-political interests (e.g. literature, graphic design, etc.) as Avri.
- Noa has falsely assumed the role of a marginalized person online.
Avri tweets less than a dozen times in all of 2019, receiving almost no engagement except for Likes from user Noa S, and vice versa
Noa S. and Avri have a public exchange, over six months before Avri became a public figure
Avri likes Noa's Tweet, though both accounts are hardly active, let alone highly visible for them to have met by chance
Noa's griping has low engagement except for Likes from Avri and a mutual friend
Noa tweets about a local bookstore
Avri provides the sole Like for Noa's tweet about a local bookstore
Elizabeth Bogner, an employee of that book store, is Noa's mother
A picture of Pip, a distinctive-looking spaniel, on Elizabeth Bogner's Facebook
Noa's Mom's dog on Facebook, in situ (censored to obscure identity of the page's visitor)
Further confirmation that Pip is Elizabeth Bogner's dog
Noa's mother's Twitter, with profile picture featuring Pip
Noa and Maisie (or Maze) have a fairly close sibling relationship
Maisie Shiedlower, Noa's sister, posts a picture of Pip
In her private Discord server, Avri posts a photo of Pip
Avri can't resist following and retweeting one particular person out of her 15,000 followers. Pip makes an appearance in the video shown.
Noa's LinkedIn describes her as an Birch Wathen Lenox alumna
Birch Wathen Lenox, a private school with an annual tuition just under $50k, graduated the class of 2020 on May 21
Avri's diploma is endorsed by a "Headmaster" and describes a graduation day of May 21, 2020
A close-up of Avri's diploma
A portrait of Noa from her LinkedIn
Some details, both personal and tawdry, about Avri
Avri's icon and personal self-description have an obvious resemblance to Noa
Avri's 19th birthday was recent as of mid-April 2020, which is a bit old for a HS senior
Noa's birth announcement in an academic community newsletter
Noa's father, Jesse, announces her birth using his long-standing e-mail address
The AvriSapir reddit account was created on Noa Sheidlower's 18th birthday
Noa's interest in tech companies and CSEM predates Avri's activity by months
Noa insistently tweets a NY Times article about tech companies and reports of CSEM
Noa has a passionate gripe about an organization's criticism of a bill's effectiveness
Noa's Twitter interest in the NY Equality Model is shared by Laila Mickelwait of EC
Avri is also interested in the NY Equality Model
Noa's Twitter interests are in alignment with Avri's abolitionist tendencies
More of Noa's interest in trafficking
The words of Noa's Twitter friend, Ane Mathieson, herself a New Yorker and sex work abolitionist
Noa's retweet of a classic anti-SW sentiment, which Avri shared until recently
Avri publicly asserts one of her critics, Maya Morena, is blocked. Noa has her followed
Noa's alternate Instagram page, showing her taste in art is similar to Avri's
Noa has varied interests in YouTube content, including child abuse documentaries
Noa's review of costume jewelry using a familiar scathing tone
A decade-old Blogspot page showing Noa has always had a penchant for storytelling
Noa poses as a person who relies on a wheelchair in order to shame someone in a YouTube comment
Noa, in a homemade film, is quite ambulatory as seen on the right of the frame
AvriSapir's Biography Debunked
- Avri has had a privileged, healthy upbringing.
- Avri seems to enjoy a healthy relationship with her nuclear family, including her dad.
- In the years she alleges she was trafficked, she was with loved ones, in private school, on vacation.
Despite claiming as Avri that her father is a pedophile abuser and her mom a narcissist, she is friends with both on Twitter
Noa doesn't just follow her dad, but retweets his congratulatory message
Noa retweets not only personal messages her dad writes, but casual ones as well
Avri often finds some current reason to describe her abuse, like being beaten bloody and forced to smile and pose on Halloween
Noa smiles for the camera for a picture with Dad (which Mom has left up even after Avri became active)
Avri's tawdry story of abuse sometimes includes a tangential reference to current politics to stay relevant
Avri describes being abused by a police officer at the height of the George Floyd media buzz
After six months of frequent Tweeting for the anti-PornHub cause, Avri branches out into FGM. Avri did not write a single Tweet about FGM prior to this
The doctor who cleared her to participate in a gymnastics meet failed to notice the FGM or signs of repeated sexual trauma
At age 9, she claims to have been pulled out of school to work in a brothel. (She later claimed she was an 8-year-old when interviewed by Australian journalist Ginger Gorman)
Avri's story consciously mirrors the COVID-19 pandemic and extends the "brothel era" time range into at least late 2012
In response to a storm that lasted a week, Avri's traffickers tried camming when New Yorkers suffered power outages that lasted for days
Avri names PornHub, of course, but also Tumblr and Backpage, two platforms that previously fell to abolitionist posturing
Noa, age 9, smiling in a private school uniform, when she was supposedly a brothel captive
Also at age 9, Noa was allowed by her trafficker to go to summer camp, when she was supposedly a brothel captive
Noa was not in any way sequestered from her mother or sister, when she was supposedly a brothel captive
At age 11, Noa is photographed with her sister, when she was supposedly a brothel captive
Noa was permitted Internet access and used it to make a YouTube video, when she was supposedly a brothel captive
Noa is vacationing in London, when she was supposedly a brothel captive
Two months after Avri's gritty Hurricane Sandy story, Noa poses in her "impoverished" mother's clean, upscale Manhattan co-op
Avri's Lies Matter
- Avri tells her story to boost dubious legislation.
- Avri is speaking against actual survivors and their interests, and even puts them in danger.
- Avri's fabricated story is being cited by academics.
- Avri is "hogging the mic" from abuse victims who have yet to share their stories.
- Avri is harming efforts to "believe survivors" in the future.
Avri reveals her support for the EARN IT act, including a disingenuous oversimplification of what it is
This supporter was excoriated by Avri after he publicized her agenda, which legitimate groups like Human Rights Watch vehemently oppose
Avri, not for the first or last time, targets an actual abuse and trafficking survivor who does not share the abolitionist agenda
Avri has been cited by an academic, who will in turn be cited, possibly leading to policy change based on fabricated information
Avri is recruiting other unqualified (and possibly minor) social media users to actively seek out CSEM and dangerous predators
An interesting choice of words that sound confessional, from when Avri was new to lying about abuse. She no longer seems to have that issue.
Avri has demonstrably lied, and her sustained propagation of the sentiment "believe survivors" only hurts real victims in the long run
With no shame or irony, AvriSapir complains about narrative contortion when she is among the foremost perpetrators of such
Spread the Word on AvriSapir
- This information isn't illegal to share.
- Her family and the professionals who gave her a platform ignored opportunities to resolve this privately.
- No one benefits more from Avri's lies than Exodus Cry
- Sharing this information is the right thing to do.
Isn't this doxxing?
No. AvriSapir and her supporters use that word loosely, but it has a strict legal definition that is not being violated by disseminating this information.
How is this not doxxing?
Because it does not provide any information that could be used to harm her, nor does it suggest where that information might be found. There is no address, phone number, or mention of which Starbucks she likes to go to when it's time to invent vivid tales of a child being brutalized. (She actually made up a stalker who recognized her at Starbucks. But, again, never explained how this man matched the Avri Twitter account to the little girl in an illicit video to the young woman having a mocha frap in that specific New York City location. Those are some long odds.) This album concerns the pseudonym of someone who has worked very hard to become established as a spokesperson for a cause. She has invested hours daily Tweeting her personal grievances and her demands for remedy by a corporation and the government. She has allowed herself to be interviewed by journalists and academics in service of her political agenda. To put it succinctly, she has made herself a public figure. With all the information together as it is here, it's abundantly clear that she has not been telling the truth, which is something the public deserves to know. There was no way to make that connection clear without associating her real identity and her invented persona.
Isn't this cyberstalking?
No. The federal definition of cyberstalking necessarily involves an "intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate". The intent of releasing this information is clearly to inform and makes no threatening or harassing gesture of any kind toward AvriSapir or her real-life identity. Despite her loathsome conduct, every effort was taken to minimize harm to the person calling herself AvriSapir. Her father
, her sister
, and her mother
were each contacted (some multiple times) over various platforms, several weeks prior to the initial release of this information. Not one of them responded. The academic who consulted Avri for her first-hand knowledge of CSEM and CSA, Dr. Michael Salter, did not respond
to an e-mail offering proof that Avri's story was full of falsehoods. The journalist who covered Avri, Ginger Gorman, meticulously answered every other Tweet
in a thread except an attempt to share this information discreetly. Avri can take up the issue with those people. Perhaps for her they'll respond in a timely fashion.
Is this computer hacking?
No. All of this information was acquired legally, using only public information sources. None of the social media content, including photos, required any special access or deception to obtain. She even made the link to her "private" Discord publicly available.
It really feels like it's illegal, though.
Well, it isn't. In Avri's social media echo chamber, words can mean whatever she wants them to mean, but in the real world, words have some objective value. Avri was not offered any incentive to act in a certain manner (i.e. "bribery") nor threatened or coerced into taking any action in exchange for this information remaining hidden (i.e. "blackmail"). She was not contacted at all regarding this information, and will have learned of its existence in real time. Nothing in this report is orthogonal to the matter, which is the lack of veracity regarding AvriSapir's claims. In fact, several images that were irrelevant but potentially embarrassing were excluded to avoid causing her unnecessary emotional distress. Ergo, this information is definitively not the result of "cyberstalking" or any other illegal activity. If you're concerned about illegal activity, first consider how Avri was able to talk in detail about the content of a CSEM video that NCMEC requested be removed.
Why does Exodus Cry keep getting mentioned?
Because Exodus Cry is the root of the issue. Avri's behavior, while shameful, is merely a symptom. In all likelihood, Exodus Cry will throw Avri under the bus, say what a shame it is that someone would lie about being abused the way she has, and they had nothing to do with her misdeeds. They'll likely suggest it "doesn't matter" that Avri lied because stories like hers are far too common. However, few unverified stories approximate the level of horror and repugnance present in Avri's. No account that can be independently corroborated comes close. The truth is, Exodus Cry did not care whether Avri was telling the truth, and they have a history of disposing of survivors as soon as they have become no longer useful to the organization. Exodus Cry is a parasite that exists only to benefit its founders. It feeds on the suffering of real survivors and the imagination of fellow zealots who tell unconscionable lies to conflate all adult content with sex trafficking. If you were planning to donate to them, hopefully this information will give you pause. Consider making a donation to a charity that actually helps others. If you don't have a preference, the EFF
are unsung and underappreciated heroes.
Who paid you to do all this work to discredit Avri?
No one paid for this. It was a labor of love. Avri may have slipped under the radar if not for her increasing viciousness towards actual CSA, CSEM, and trafficking survivors over political differences or even some mundane disagreement. In hindsight, it becomes clear that when a proclaimed survivor wields their past experiences like a cudgel, odds are they're affiliated with Exodus Cry. Avri got a little carried away and got the wrong kind of attention. She seems fairly bright. Hopefully, she learns from the experience and gets help overcoming the issues that led her to do these awful things.
What am I supposed to do?
Share this link freely. Recognize there's no such thing as a lie told "for a greater good." Be excellent to each other.
зови меня змей